|

















Copyright
© 2001 FleetWatch magazine and FleetWatch On-Line.
No
part of this publication may be reproduced without the prior written
permission from the publishers. Views published are not necessarily
those of the publishers.
|
|
Figures, analysis and comment supplied
quarterly by
Richard Proctor-Sims
|

|
|
Q1
2006 over Q1 2005 sales increase by a huge 27%
-
by Richard Proctor-Sims
IN THE face
of most predictions, including our own as well as that of
Naamsa – the vehicle industry’s representative body –
sales of all new vehicles in the first quarter of 2006 were
almost 27% higher than those for the equivalent 2005
quarter. This increase is in the same ball park as the Q1
2005/Q1 2004 or the full year 2005/2004 increases (28% and
32% respectively). A Q1/Q1 increase closer to 10%,
indicating a market correction, had been widely
expected.
Table A
summarises the first quarter performances of all the new
vehicle market sectors for 2004, 2005 and 2006. If the
present average rate of increase were sustained, the size of
the overall market would double in less than the four years
to 2008, compared with the five years previously
indicated.
|
Table
A.
First Quarter and index
comparisons for
new vehicle sales in 2004, 2005 and 2006 |
| |
Q1
2004 |
Q1
2005 |
Q1
2006 |
|
Cars |
69 842 |
100 |
85
983 |
123 |
103
175 |
149 |
|
LCVs |
30 702 |
100 |
35
687 |
116 |
44 137 |
144 |
|
MCVs |
1 697 |
100 |
2
448 |
144 |
3
150 |
186 |
|
HCVs |
2 589 |
100 |
3
806 |
126 |
4
379 |
146 |
|
M/HCVs |
4
286 |
100 |
5
472 |
128 |
6
936 |
162 |
|
Total market |
104
830 |
100 |
127
081 |
121 |
155
272 |
148 |
The higher
growth rate of the MCV sector – and the
consequential growth of combined M/HCVs – is clear from
this presentation.
In the
numbered tables which follow, it will be seen that after
little more than two years in this country, Tata has joined
the market leaders. It now leads the MCV table (Table 2), is
third in the heavy truck table (Table 3), fifth for
extra-heavy trucks (Table 4) and third in the overall table
(Table 1).
While it may
be natural for some competitors to suggest to always eager
ears "that the newcomer is pricing
unrealistically" or "that its parts availability
is poor and parts prices high" or even "that its
countrywide support and service will not be
sustainable", it is incontrovertible that Tata has
invigorated the market. It is also fair to speculate that
the market surge over the past two years would have been
less dramatic without Tata’s presence.
All the recent
positive trends are still in place for new vehicle sales to
remain buoyant: • business confidence and GDP growth
remain high
-
tax,
interest and exchange rates are stable
-
vehicle
prices are increasingly more affordable
-
there are
increasing levels of tender and other work
Equally
important is the competition within the transport and
logistics industry today, which demands both shorter
first-use vehicle cycles for the premium haulers and
distributors and access to continually improving fuel and
other technologies for all the players who are determined to
survive. Some might regret the change but transport has now
moved well and truly out the ambit of truckers and into the
boardroom.
With no
squalls visible, the present sales patterns should continue
for at least the next quarter. As for the remainder of 2006,
who knows? Most vehicle manufacturer CEOs and their teams
have so far been able to manage their inventory levels –
no mean feat – and it now seems possible to suggest that
they may be setting their sights on a year-on-year growth of
between 17% and 22%.
|
 |
Comment:
The colour
entries in this and the other tables indicate players whose
year-onyear increases are higher than average. Of the
established players, MAN, Tyco, Iveco and Volkswagen have
started the year on a high note, though none have
experienced Tata’s spectacular growth. Volvo’s
performance was marred by a nil sales return for trucks in
March. Only time will tell whether this is an error. Market
leader DaimlerChrysler has made a hesitant start, which both
Toyota/Hino and Tata looking threatening. Sales by General
Motors, Scania and, to a lesser extent, Nissan Diesel and
Toyota/Hino underperformed compared with the rest of the
market. Nissan’s entry into the MCV market in competition
with its close relative Nissan Diesel means that 17
manufacturers, assemblers and importers are now represented
in the total truck and bus market in Southern Africa, with
half-a-dozen additional marques.
|
|
|
Comment:
Not long ago, this vehicle category had half-a-dozen main
competitors, with Mercedes-Benz and Iveco accounting for
most van sales and Toyota, Nissan Diesel and Isuzu most
truck sales. How different is the picture today, with twice
as many players and Tata in the lead with more than 24% of
total sales. Iveco appears to be climbing out of its recent
hole, but, of the current sales of major players Mercedes-
Benz, Isuzu and even Toyota and Nissan Diesel have been
disappointing.
|
 |
Comment:
Although their contributions were relatively minor, only
MAN, Fuso and Iveco joined Tata in achieving above-average
first-quarter growth. Isuzu and Mercedes- Benz again
disappointed. Unusually, the growth rate of this sector was
the highest for the industry in the quarter under review.
|
 |
Comment:
The "redness" of this table is balanced by Q1 2006
sales returns from no fewer than five established players
– Isuzu, Volvo, Mercedes-Benz, Scania and Nissan Diesel
– that were lower than Q1 2005. This could be a worrying
development. From not being represented in this weight
category a year ago, Tata is already in fifth position, with
the possibility of climbing still higher.
|
|
Comment:
Only five players have sold bus and coach chassis so far
this year, with Nissan Diesel, Volkswagen and Iveco – all
in last year’s table – so far unrepresented. No
significance need be attached to the apparently high
first-quarter sales increase or, except for MAN’s first
position, in the present ranking of the other main players.
The fourth quarter is usually best for bus sales and anyway,
as often said in this column, bus sales will remain small
beer until the South African government gets to grips with
South Africa’s public transport realities.
|
|
The tables refer
to Naamsa members’ sales of new trucks and buses in South
Africa, Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia and Swaziland _ the five
countries of the Southern African Customs Union (Sacu). New truck
and bus sales by non-members of Naamsa are not significant.
Analysis and
comment © 2006 Richard Proctor-Sims - fontein@wol.co.za
- from whom further information is available.
|
|