|

















Copyright
© 2001 FleetWatch magazine and FleetWatch On-Line.
No
part of this publication may be reproduced without the prior written
permission from the publishers. Views published are not necessarily
those of the publishers.
|
|
Figures, analysis and comment supplied
quarterly by
Richard Proctor-Sims
|

|
|
Despite
a 22% growth rate, the end of the
long bull run may be in sight
by Richard Proctor-Sims
WHILE
quarter-on-quarter sales for Q2 2006/2005 continued to grow,
there was a slowdown compared with the unexpectedly strong
Q1/Q1 return, which saw an increase in the medium and heavy
vehicle (M/HCV) sector of the market of no less than 27%.
Q2/Q2 came in at 17%, to make the average growth for the
first half of this year 22% higher than the total for the
first six months of 2005.
While perhaps
too soon for an accurate prediction to be suggested, the
signs are that sales for the full 2006 year may be no higher
than the 10-12% increase for calendar 2005 widely projected
at the end of 2005.
The rationale
for this possibility will continue to be analysed after
Tables A-C, which may provide some useful pointers.
Table A shows
the relative strength of the sales of all the new vehicle
categories (including cars and light commercials) in the
first half of 2006 compared with the same period in 2005.
The strongest sector was heavy commercials (HCVs), while the
weakest was light commercials (LCVs).
|
Table
A.
Sales of new vehicles in
Southern Africa by
Naamsa members for the first half of 2005 and 2006 |
| |
2005
(first
six months) |
2006
(first
six months) |
Change |
|
Cars |
175 207 |
208
175 |
+18.8% |
|
LCVs |
75 746 |
86
841 |
+14.6% |
|
MCVs |
5 689 |
6
718 |
+18.1% |
|
HCVs |
6 830 |
8
546 |
+24.5% |
|
Total market |
263
472 |
310
280 |
+17.8% |
Table B shows
the Q1/Q1 and Q2/Q2 results for 2005 and 2006 in units and
indices for the four sectors of the M/HCV market. The
slowdown in growth is immediately apparent. The extraheavy
sector performed best in these Q2 comparisons, with MCVs
losing some of their first-quarter growth.
|
Table
B.
First and second quarter 2005 and
2006 unit sales and indices
for the medium and heavy commercial market (100 = the
2005 quarters) |
| |
2005
Q1 |
2006
Q1 |
2005
Q2 |
2006
Q2 |
|
MCVs |
2 448 |
100 |
3
135 |
129 |
3 243 |
100 |
3 568 |
110 |
|
Heavy trucks |
991 |
100 |
1
471 |
148 |
1
332 |
100 |
1
598 |
120 |
|
Extra heavies |
1 858 |
100 |
2
065 |
111 |
2
200 |
100 |
2 859 |
130 |
|
Buses |
175 |
100 |
250 |
143 |
274 |
100 |
303 |
111 |
|
M/HCV totals |
5
472 |
100 |
6
936 |
127 |
7
049 |
100 |
8
328 |
117 |
Table C
illustrates the cyclical nature of the market, with the four
most recent quarters providing the examples. The third
quarter of 2005 was stronger than both the fourth quarter of
2005 and the first quarter of 2006, being overtaken only by
the second quarter of 2006. For the remainder of this year,
the challenge in the third quarter will be to improve on the
already strong performance in Q3/2005. In this context, the
strength of Q1/2006 vis-à-vis Q1/2005 is, in fact, a
weakness if the comparison were to be made with Q3 and
Q4/2005. It will be interesting in three months’ time to
see the extent of the Q3 improvement in 2006 over the
comparable 2005 period.
|
Table
C.
Unit sales and indices for
the past three quarters (100 = Q3/2005) |
| |
2005
Q3 |
2006
Q4 |
2005
Q1 |
2006
Q2 |
|
MCVs |
3 243 |
100 |
3
315 |
102 |
3 150 |
97 |
3 568 |
110 |
|
Heavy trucks |
1 555 |
100 |
1
298 |
83 |
1
471 |
95 |
1
598 |
103 |
|
Extra heavies |
2 535 |
100 |
2
360 |
93 |
2 065 |
81 |
2 859 |
113 |
|
Buses |
292 |
100 |
293 |
100 |
250 |
86 |
303 |
104 |
|
M/HCV totals |
7
622 |
100 |
7
266 |
95 |
6
936 |
91 |
8
328 |
109 |
While these
three tables help our appreciation of the dynamics of the
current market, they should not be allowed to cloud the main
picture, which shows that the region’s new heavy
commercial vehicle market is experiencing record
highs.
The slowdown
has, however, also become clear. Its main influences have
been, and for the time will continue to be, the weaker trend
of the rand against other major currencies, which is
hardening a range of vehicle and other prices and thus
reducing the capacity to invest; and the increasing cost of
fuels and lubricants, both in absolute and exchange-rate
terms, which is increasing operating costs and decreasing
margins for fixed-priced contracts.
In the
numbered tables which follow, Tata again emerges as the star
performer. In a time-frame that most newcomers would need to
establish no more than a toehold in the market, this
Indian-based company continues to confound its competitors.
It now holds first, second, third and fifth positions
respectively in Tables 2, 1, 3 and 5. This company’s
achievement in overtaking Toyota/Hino to take second
position in the Southern African market in less than three
years is nothing short of remarkable given the Japanese
company’s long experience in our market, its strong ties
with South African entrepreneurs and customers, and its
formidable dealer network.
|
 |
Comment:
The colour
entries in this and the other tables indicate players whose
year-onyear increases are higher than average. Of the
established players, Iveco, Tyco and MAN continued their
strong performances, though none have shared in Tata’s
spectacular growth. None of the other companies manage to
equal the average growth of the market. Volvo, previously a
tower of strength in the heavy truck market, finds itself in
the bottom third of the table and, at present, a serious
competitor only in the large bus market.
|
|
|
Comment:
In this table, Tata has
actually lost ground compared with the first quarter, with
its market share dropping from 24% to 21%. Iveco, of the
established players, as well as Volkswagen and other new
competitors have strengthened their positions in this
market.
|
 |
Comment:
Until recently a Cinderella
compared with the heavier and lighter truck sectors, the
heavy truck category has enjoyed two successive quarters as
the fastestgrowing sector of the commercial vehicle
market.
|
 |
Comment:
No fewer than 10 of the 16
entries in this table are "red", indicating higher
than average (in this case, 21.3%) growth between 2005 and
2006. Some are new players and some are small players, but
they do include five manufacturers who have been
long-established in the market – Freightliner,
International, MAN, Iveco and Daf. However, all six of the
"non-red", or below-average-growth, players are
similarly long-established – Volvo, Mercedes-Benz, Scania,
Hino, Nissan Diesel and Isuzu. Between them, these
illustrious manufacturers delivered 2552 units into the
extra-heavy market in the first six months of 2005 but only
2365, or 7.3% fewer, units into this market in the first
half of 2006. The conclusion to be drawn is that if it had
not for Tata and other new players, 2006/2005 growth would
have been modest, if not minimal.
|
|
Comment:
In June, Daf sold its first
buses into the Southern African market, while Iveco has also
rejoined this market in a small way.
|
|
The tables refer
to Naamsa members’ sales of new trucks and buses in South
Africa, Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia and Swaziland _ the five
countries of the Southern African Customs Union (Sacu). New truck
and bus sales by non-members of Naamsa are not significant.
Analysis and
comment © 2006 Richard Proctor-Sims - fontein@wol.co.za
- from whom further information is available.
|
|