|
|
|
|
| Past Issues |
Nov/Dec 2007 |
|
transmissions |
|
It’s not often that one gets the opportunity to drive a range of 20 truck and bus applications equipped with a variety of transmissions. A special fleet owner and press event in Hungary at the Euro-ring Test Track near Budapest proved to be a well organised event where Allison Transmission guests could drive this 20- truck fleet in diverse operating conditions and get first-hand experience. Is there really a difference between an automated manual-shift transmission (AMT) and a fullautomatic torque convertor transmission? What are the acceleration characteristics comparing AMT to full auto, and what is ‘clutch fudge’? FleetWatch technical correspondent Dave Scott was there to answer these and other question.
TO TAKE JUST one step back into history, today there are no trucks on the road equipped with a ‘crash-box’. ‘Crashbox’ is exactly what it means – gear ratios are changed by sliding different gears in and out of mesh with each other creating a noisy ‘crashing’ effect. This very old technology –
stuff from the 1st half of the 20th Century – gave way to constant mesh
designs that are even used today in auto-shift transmissions without
synchromesh cones. All manual gearboxes are constant mesh in design –
those without synchronizing rings have been misnamed as ‘crashboxes’
simply because gearshifts are an art without synchro-cones to assist a
sliding sleeve engage a gear on the output shaft.
MT, AMT or full auto The torque-convertor, fully automatic transmission, pioneered in trucks and buses by Allison Transmission, has been around for many years well before the arrival of AMT. Allison’s first fully-automatic, production-series transmission was manufactured in 1948 for coaches and off-highway vehicles – trucking applications only arrived in the market from 1956 onwards. A constant mesh transmission without synchro-cones to assist gear changing is still around on South Africa’s roads but in dwindling numbers because without synchromesh, using a standard Eaton transmission, gear-shifts are a skilled driving art. As the SA skilled driver pool diminishes, this type of gearbox design becomes more of a hazard than a reliable, cost-effective, driveline tool. AMT has saved the day for
Eaton. Ever since Freightliner adopted the automated manual transmission
– SmartShift in terms of their branding – the AMT box has taken off in
the over 56t gross combination mass (GCM) segment and in fact, has
probably rescued Eaton from extinction on our roads, enhancing the two USA
brands – Freightliner and International.
But the word ‘automatic’ does not imply that an AMT unit has identical performance characteristics in specific applications to the torque convertor auto-box. When it comes to very frequent vehicle launch and stop operations, extreme off-road conditions, or constant traffic gridlock situations in distribution tasks, then a torque convertor is superior to a an electronicallyoperated clutch. What’s driving Allison Transmission sales in South Africa? It’s a combination of application requirements aggravated by lack of driver skill together with as many as three drivers using one truck in a 24- hour shift. At dairy produce distribution companies such as Clover, where there are over 100 Allison fully automatic gearboxes in operation, they actually blank off the 1 and 2 gear positions on the automatic shift lever to reduce a driver’s option to forward (D), neutral (N) or reverse (R). As Dup du Plessis, Technical Manager of Fast-’n-Fresh puts it: "The objective is to minimise the options associated with and deskill the tasks of truck driving." An Allison auto-box really
proves its torque convertor benefits when reversing into difficult loading
bays, where there may even be a gradient to overcome. Driving both AMT and
full automatic transmission units recently at the Euro-Ring test track
gave ample proof of the superiority of the torque convertor automatic over
the AMT unit in reversing situations. Instead of constantly engaging or
disengaging a clutch as with an AMT unit, the Allison torque convertor
takes up the slip while still multiplying torque to allow for a smooth
flow of engine Nm into the driveline as a driver inches backwards. An
auto-box with torque convertor simply provides more control over reversing
and is a key factor in minimising rear end damage from badly managed
reverse shunts.
Full auto – off-road
favourite "An Allison auto, on the other hand, never interrupts the flow of torque to the wheels while it shifts gear, the advantage of this being that a vehicle that is equipped with an Allison will up-shift under load or incline or soft ground conditions where a clutchequipped vehicle would never make the shift. An Allison auto box truck will run faster and use less fuel in these conditions because it is running in a higher gear." And then – to coin an expression – ‘clutch fudge’ compounds the problem of vehicle start-ability on a gradient
What is ‘clutch-fudge’? 1ST GEAR GRADE-ABILITY on a specification sheet means the gradient that a truck can handle on the move at maximum GVM at full torque – without de-rated loss for altitude – and without taking into account any road surface rolling resistance. A road surface of loose sand equals a rolling resistance of up to 10% that must be added to the grade resistance to determine the total gradeability required. But this still does not include a factor for start-ability should the truck stall on the gradient and need to launch itself from a standing start. It’s an often-overlooked fact that vehicle % grade-ability does not allow for % gradient start-ability. This is where a standard clutch slips on launch from stand-still and reduces 1st gear grade-ability by anywhere up to 12%. A standard clutch is not a torque convertor – it’s there to interrupt Nm flowing into a gearbox and unlike an automatic transmission with torque convertor, a clutch does not multiply torque when a truck starts against a gradient. This is ‘clutch-fudge’ where gradeability spec comparisons between trucks equipped with automatic torque convertors and manual transmissions overlook the startability factor. If the truck stalled in Chart A on a 30% gradient, it would require a 1st gear grade-ability of at least 40% to get moving again and not 30% as indicated from the chart. A poor road surface compounds the problem even further. It’s no wonder that overlooking the ‘clutch-fudge’ factor has burnt out many clutches on what would be perceived to be average and not severe gradients. Start-ability is another reason why automatic torque convertor transmissions are the favourite for severe off-road conditions. But even around the suburbs of the Durban/Pinetown region, there are some very ‘interesting’, hard-surface gradients for trucks to negotiate where startability can be easily ‘fudged’. There are a number of
transmissions equipped with a crawler gear – a deep 1st gear ratio that
is designed to deal with startability emergencies and move a truck out of
a ‘hole’ but it is for that only and is not designed to be shifted on
the move into the next gear. Use the crawler gear to get to a less severe
gradient and then start off in 2nd. This is where an Allison auto box has
an advantage as it can effect a shift change at very slow speeds.
Is the ‘fudge’ factor
taken into account? Remember that clutch failures are more often caused by reversing than by going forward. This has been regarded as a major factor in favour of the Allison automatic in some fleets where rear-end loading-bay shunting damage has been minimised because of the ease of reversing with a torque convertor. In the long term, AMT units will take over from standard synchromesh transmissions in long-haul applications and even in distribution vehicles but will have their limitations in comparison to a torque convertor full auto transmission for certain strenuous applications. An Allison automatic will also out-accelerate an AMT unit even when driven by a more powerful engine – so if productivity factors are reduced to seconds in a constant stop-andlaunch operation - such as a refuse compactor - the torque convertor automatic can produce more payload units in a day. Manufacturers of automated
manual shift transmissions cannot claim to be all things to all
applications when multiplying driveline torque in trucking. There’s a
distinct difference between an AMT and a torque convertor auto box – I
have had the privilege of being able to go beyond paper and drive these
units for comparison purposes.
|
Copyright © 2007
FleetWatch magazine and FleetWatch On-Line.
No part of this publication may be reproduced without the prior written
permission from the publishers.
Views published are not necessarily those of the publishers.