|
 |
In our October 2008
edition, we featured Part 1 of a face-to-face interview with Jo
Grové, CEO of Unitrans Holdings. In this edition, Patrick
O'Leary continues the interview in which he solicits the
views of this respected industry leader on a wide range of
subjects pertinent to the industry. |
|
Power
Broker
Jo Grové, CEO of Unitrans
Holdings, is a hands-on, street-wise trucking ‘boykie’ who has
his finger firmly on the pulse of the challenges, issues and daily
grind of South African trucking. |
FW: As
previously discussed, the industry is facing a severe skills crisis due to a
lack of training structures and doing away with the former apprenticeship
system. We also know that people have left the country due to the high crime
rate. How is crime affecting the ability of companies like Unitrans to
attract and retain qualified staff?
JG: We
have heard some politicians say in the past that if people don’t believe
in this country, they must leave. But that doesn’t make sense because
people love this country and are very patriotic. However, crime has done
some horrible things to people and the patriotism tends to disappear when
your best friend’s wife has been raped and the husband has been shot in
their home. When it gets personal, people understandably look for safer
places to live and that affects our entire economy in that fewer skills
are left behind to man the economy.
To me, crime is a major issue
because crime acts on the psyche. You lose good people because they fear for
their safety. We’ve got people in our organization - young people - who
are being targeted all the time by overseas companies. We’re losing their
skills because for these guys, their primary instinct is safety and security
for their families. So crime is having a very serious effect on the country’s
skilled workforce and the government needs to act decisively to beat crime.
I really believe it can be sorted out but it needs an iron rod so that you
get people to understand that if they don’t toe the line, they’re going
to get into big trouble. Of course, enforcement is the big issue and here
you need leadership. With the forces available to Government, they could
sort out the crime problem but it needs strong leadership to drive the
fight. Up to now, there has been zero leadership on this front. It’s
actually very sad.
FW: Apart
from causing a skills exodus, do you see crime adding costs to the
company?
JG: Yes, we are
seeing this. It goes in spikes but we’re certainly seeing an increase
and especially in our fuel business. Fuel is black gold and is very
valuable. Unfortunately, there are instances where there are insiders
involved; where there are drivers involved in the crime. Not all the time,
but there are those instances. It is a difficult one to manage.
FW: The
general perception is that most truck hijackings involve internal collusion.
Would you agree with this?
JG: I don’t have
the stats and it would be a bit arrogant of me to say that was the case
because I don’t really know. But certainly we have had a number of
instances where a fuel truck has been hijacked and we’ve found that the
driver was involved. But generally speaking these guys are sitting ducks
to that. The guy drives a fixed route day in and day out. He’s a sitting
duck when someone stops him. We have tracking devices and use technology
to the best of our ability but in the climate of high crime in which we
live, when someone’s concentrating their efforts and their time on
catching you, they’re going to catch you.
FW: With
the lack of skilled workers such as diesel mechanics being a reality, a lot
of companies are relying on OEMs to do their vehicle servicing through
maintenance contracts and the like. Is this a trend for the future? Is it
something you like or do you prefer your own in-house workshops and
controls?
JG: I’ve got mixed
feelings about it. It’s an easy way out for the transport operator but
those contracts are fraught with small print. There are a lot of potholes
in this. For example, when they take the vehicle back after a three, four
or five year period, the residual value is not as you thought – but it’s
there in the small print. The guys then fall short on their
trade-ins.
I think the manufacturers
saw it as an income stream and kind of tried to make it easy for the
operators. The operators have been caught between a rock and a hard place
in the sense that they can’t get good diesel mechanics and can’t
afford to put up expensive work bays with all the diagnostic equipment. So
having one centre where all trucks could be sent to, as opposed to having
five of their own centres, is seen as a way of keeping costs down.
Generally though, I don’t
believe it’s been good for the industry because the maintenance of a
vehicle is your primary responsibility – there’s no question about
that. If you’re in the trucking business, maintenance is a core part of
the business and we’ve seen that in Namibia where we operate older
vehicles and do all the maintenance ourselves. We have to maintain those
vehicles because they’re older. People look at a truck-tractor today as
a disposable item. They say it’s got a life of two years – or four or
five depending on the operation – they sign a maintenance contract, try
outsource everything around it and hope the guys maintain it properly and
then trade it in after three or four or five years. It’s a bit of a
cop-out, of which we’re also guilty.
FW: Let’s
talk road to rail. What’s your message to those people who want goods
moved from road to rail?
JG: I’ve been over
the statistics and I think something like 87% of all products in this
country are moved on road and 13% on rail. The interesting thing is that
in Germany, which is a sophisticated country, the numbers are quite
similar. So road transport plays a vital role in keeping the wheels of an
economy moving. That said, I also believe there are certain products which
do not belong on road and as a road transporter, I say that not with
tongue in cheek but really meaning it. Mining products, bulk products,
belong on rail not on road. That, to me, is where Transnet’s rail
operation should be concentrating its efforts. Coal is a very successful
commodity for rail but there are also others.
FW: I know
that for the past few years you have been trying to get Spoornet to buy into
your RoadRailer multi-model concept. What is the progress on that?
JG: It’s actually
about six or seven years that we’ve been working on that – without
much success. The concept has been operating successfully in the U.S. for
twenty years where they take a train of about 150 road units and with one
locomotive, move them between major centres. What they are effectively
doing is taking 150 trucks off the road every time that train
operates.
If this system were
introduced on the Durban- Johannesburg and the Johannesburg-Cape Town
corridors, you could move a lot of product that’s running on those roads
onto rail and then have distribution at either end where you could create
an enormous number of new jobs. A 150-unit train coming into Cape Town
needs 150 primary movers to move each of those units to its final
distribution point.
Through this, you will
create lots of BEE opportunities where small operators running a few
vehicles can operate close to their home base, close to their maintenance
facilities and make money. That makes a lot of sense to me.
FW: And it
gets trucks off the road.
JG: Exactly. And that’s
what you want to do. You want to take a big volume of vehicles off your
major routes. So it’s been very disappointing for us that Spoornet - or
Transnet Rail – hasn’t embraced this technology that has been so
successful in the US and which we have been trying to introduce here for
the last six or seven years.
|

|
Roadtrailer
Unitrans has been
working on the Roadrailer concept for six to seven years. If
introduced to the Durban- Johannesburg, Johannesburg-Cape Town
corridors, a lot of product on those roads could be moved to rail.
Distribution at either end will create an enormous number of
jobs. |
FW: But
surely importing such units would make them prohibitively expensive. Are
there any plans to build them here?
JG: We would never
build them anywhere else. We would have to build them here and we have the
rights to do so under license to the US manufacturer. All the skills are
here to do it and here again, new jobs would be created. And what I can’t
understand is that Transnet Rail would benefit as we want them to be a
partner in the business as they need to guarantee the line and charge a
fee for it. It’s new business for them and that is why I cannot
understand their reluctance to make a decision on this.
FW:
Let’s talk global warming. How in touch is Unitrans with this subject? Is
global warming and your role in minimizing environmental impacts by, for
example, using biofuel, discussed round the boardroom table?
JG: It is. But, we
don’t make fuel. Rather, we use what’s available to us and
unfortunately, I think the global push for biofuel has backfired in that
it has been taken to the point where we now have a food crisis. So much
maize and stuff has been diverted into biofuel production that we now have
a global food shortage which is a major problem. So I think one has to be
realistic. Certainly I’m not suggesting that one has to stick with
fossil fuels for the rest of time because one clearly can’t do that.
However, I think that on a continent like ours, to have a major biofuels
industry is going to be expensive. It’s not something we want to get
involved in, it’s not our business and all the vehicles we run at the
moment run on fossil fuels. However, if they could run on biofuels and
could switch, we would happily do so. But where do you buy the fuel
from?
FW: Have
you done any tests on vehicles using biofuel?
JG: No we haven’t
and it’s not something we can really influence at this stage. I think we
are a bit of a follower as opposed to a leader in the sense that fuel is
not our business. We’re a consumer of fuel and our contribution is
therefore to use the best low-emission vehicles we can find to minimize
our carbon footprint. There’s a big push to do that and we support that
one hundred percent as emissions are a major concern to everybody these
days. In this sense, we have a relatively young fleet and don’t run old
vehicles. But I must say again that if there is enough biofuel available
and we can run it, clearly we would happily do so.
FW: With 3
000 vehicles in your national fleet, you are a major fuel user. How else,
apart from buying low emission trucks, can you lesson your environmental
impacts?
JG: As a fuel user,
we have a responsibility to be as frugal as possible in our consumption of
fuel and to this end, we place a lot of accent on driver training as well
as on maintaining our vehicles to the highest standards. We take the
approach that if you don’t maintain your vehicles, they’re going to
burn more fuel than they should. Ensuring fuel efficiency through driver
training and maintenance is a major contribution we can make towards
reducing our impact on global warming.
FW: What
are your feelings on Black Economic Empowerment? There are many who feel the
BEE route has failed in its intentions?
JG: I think if you
spread the wealth among the poor, you will have succeeded with empowerment
so to me, empowerment - like charity - begins at home. The best
empowerment deal you can do is to empower your own people in each company.
Instead of having one major Black shareholder, rather have the 4 000 Black
people who work for you become shareholders in the business. That’s
empowerment because now you’re spreading the wealth. And each one of
those people supports a family of four or five so when you expand that to
20 000 people in one company with 4 000 employees, man, that’s
empowerment.
More importantly, when the
employee retires, he sells his shares and he’s got a really good nest
egg he can retire on. And I don’t say you should exclude the Whites from
that. Why should I exclude a guy who works for me as a mechanic because he
happens to be White? He must be part of the team. It doesn’t have to be
racial because 80% of the workforce are previously disadvantaged anyway.
So everyone is going to benefit from this if you spread it right across
the workforce. I think empowerment, as has been broadly practiced, has
failed in many respects. It’s been enrichment, not empowerment.
FW:
What’s the good news for Unitrans going into the future?
JG: Our
supply chain business, as we call it, is growing well at the moment. We’re
very thrilled with the growth in the business and have won some major
contracts. Our strategy of creating supply chain solutions has really
worked well for us so we are very bullish about the future of this
business. And as I say, it’s not purely a trucking business. It’s more
of a supply chain business of which a big element is trucking. You can’t
be in a supply chain if you’re not in trucking. So we’re pretty
positive about the future and I think there are great opportunities. Also,
I don’t say this with any malice or arrogance but the hard times facing
the industry will bring about consolidation and that’s going to create
more opportunities for us, which is good for us. Trucking is a good
business to be in.
 |
Maintenance
Maintenance of vehicles
is a primary responsibility of the operator, but many are hampered by
the lack of good diesel mechanics and the cost of expensive work bays
and diagnostic equipment. |
|