|
|
|
|
| Past Issues |
September 2008 |
|
My financial journalist neighbour, Flip Meyer, comments drily: “There are two things that drive the markets, fear and greed.” He’s right, and it’s not just small businesses that falls into these traps but huge businesses as well. Just look at Eskom where, resulting from their greed or profit above power generation coupled to the desire to pay executive bonuses, current market estimates add up to a stunning R50-billion loss to the South African economy. Greed knows no borders or time zone – it’s speeded the downfall of Empires and small business. Beware it does not lead to the downfall of your business warns FleetWatch technical correspondent Dave Scott. The Ford Pinto is a USA classic. Time magazine included the 1971 Pinto on its list of the 50 worst cars of all time. As Time said: “Of course the Pinto goes on the Worst list but not because it was a particularly bad car - not particularly - but because it had a rather volatile nature. The car tended to erupt in flame in rear-end collisions. The Pinto is at the end of one of ‘autodom’s’ most notorious paper trails, the Ford Pinto memo, which ruthlessly calculates the cost of reinforcing the rear end ($121-million) versus the potential payout to victims ($50-million). Conclusion? Let ‘em burn.” There may be controversy about who actually generated that famously callous memo equating the cost of life against modifying every Pinto at $11 per car but history and perception has pinned this on Ford – ouch! A fuel tank is, after all, a safety critical item. The South African road transport industry is also easily and rapidly trapped into safety compromises when cost pressures mount – as they have of late to the point where operating expenses are horrendous. Spiralling diesel costs have dragged up many other costs while accelerating steel prices have impacted on components like brake drums and trailer connectors. The price of a machined, high quality trailer brake drum has doubled in the past 18 months and word is out in the market that attitudes have changed in some quarters towards the ready acceptance of cheap, inferior, uncertified drums so as to retain trailer manufacturing and transport operating margins. A humble trailer brake drum that retailed for around R450 now easily goes for R800. It’s no wonder the short term view is ‘give-methe-cheapie’! And from what I hear, some original equipment trailer manufacturers (OETM’s) are taking up this position. When challenged, they are prepared to replace brake drums that suffer premature failure under warranty but what of the consequences? A brake drum collapse can result in a wheel-hub fire, a jack-knife incident, tyre destruction and loss of life. Does being prepared to replace lowquality foundation brake equipment make up for these situations? Omar Essop, CEO of transport
equipment suppliers TSE-BIG MAX, makes a valid point: “Wellplanned
maintenance is the key to making savings in road-transport, not buying
cheap. For example, many trailer load-sensing valves are incorrectly set or
disconnected, resulting in wheel lockup. This results in abnormal trailer
brake lining wear which drives the linings down to the rivets which, in
turn, scores a brake drum. Aside from abnormal tyre wear, this means that a
drum will most likely have to be discarded and price rules the day for
frequent replacement flowing out of bad maintenance.”
Providing the proof TSE-BIG MAX was challenged. If a cheap machine-finished drum shows no external inferior qualities, then how do you know when the expensive material in quality casting has been, as classified in metallurgical terms, either cut short or excluded? The cheap drum was submitted to a lab-test and in brief the following was found:
Aside from the obvious dangers of using inferior quality drums, mixing cheap trailer brake drums with standard high-quality drums presents another set of problems – unequal wear rates which means that forecasting replacement becomes a nightmare. With non-discernable differences between quality and inferior drums, the obvious question is: How do you tell the difference? On this point, the buyer is entitled to a copy of a lab certificate covering the batch of brake drums purchased. Note that this must be a laboratory that can stand scrutiny – there are certificates out there that are not worth the paper they are written on. TSE-BIG MAX has supplied over 300 000 brake drums to the road transport industry in its 22-year history and claim no comebacks through adhering to strict quality standards that include supplier certificates. At a time when truck accidents are receiving much negative attention, trailer foundation brakes are key to preventing trailer jack-knifing and the road transport industry, cost beleaguered as it is, cannot afford to compromise on this issue.
Kingpin quality And it’s not only brake drums where the problem exists. Kingpins not conforming to any quality specification are also being sold into our market. A kingpin is exactly what it means – it is the ‘king pin’ of final connection between a truck tractor and semi-trailer and a focal point of gross combination mass stress. When 5th wheels are serviced, nothing gets as frequently overlooked as kingpins. Lack of attention to kingpins is magnified when trailers are parked off while truck tractors are cleaned, checked and lubricated. It’s shocking to even contemplate cast iron locking bolts being used to retain a king pin in a semi-trailer rubbing plate - but this does occur. An attempt to rebuild a worn kingpin is certainly the bottom scale of trailer maintenance. The recommendation is never, and I repeat never, rebuild a worn king pin. A new ‘2-inch’ kingpin has an outside diameter dimension at 50,8 mm and when this is worn to 49 mm, it is time for replacement. It seems that nowadays, when profit is at stake, truck safety - including the safety of all road users - is negotiable. Lowering safety standards can become an entrenched way of doing things when price versus profit becomes the over-riding consideration. In such a culture, even when the economy is strong, a tendency remains to gravitate to the lowest standard. A challenge for any maintenance system is not just to track aggregated costs in a lump sum account but rather to manage a segmented analysis of maintenance incidents causing those expenses. A further vital aspect is segregating and flagging safety critical items from routine maintenance for immediate attention. Failure of a safety critical component is an advance warning of a rash of problems that can result in loss of life or cargo, personal injury and vehicle downtime. Unplanned replacement of a safety critical component can be likened to one case of rabies – a single incident should be treated as an epidemic. In these financially stressed
times for road transport, take care that making a profit in the bank does
not end up in losing the rig in service. Survival is the key and that does
not mean lowering of safety standards.
|
Copyright © 2008
FleetWatch magazine and FleetWatch On-Line.
No part of this publication may be reproduced without the prior written
permission from the publishers.
Views published are not necessarily those of the publishers.