When
is a 4 tonner not a 4 tonner ?
 |
|
FAW
4,5 ton workhorse
|
Some
manufacturers are advertising their vehicles as '4-tonners'
while, in fact, these vehicles are not legally capable of
carrying 4 tons of freight. This was pointed out to FleetWatch
by FAW after the company lost orders to a competitive manufacturer
which, FAW claims, 'erroneously' advertises its vehicles as
4-tonners. Many operators are thus buying these vehicles in
the belief they will carry 4 tons of payload. They will -
but not legally, claims FAW who asked FleetWatch to investigate
the subject. Jack Webster, our correspondent on legislation,
has come up with some interesting observations.
The
question 'when is a 4-tonner not a 4-tonner' gives rise to
what is probably the most frequent inquiry when discussing
the capacity of motor vehicles, particularly goods vehicles.
Of key relevance, however, is to determine what we are talking
about - gross mass, or payload mass? Until this is known,
it is not possible to give an accurate answer.
There
is obviously a big difference and in order to gain a complete
understanding and appreciation of the ramifications, a full
explanation is given here:
- If
gross mass is to be used as the vehicle capacity, the permissible
maximum vehicle mass must be determined, which is denoted
with the Symbol "V". The "V" of a vehicle
is obtained by taking the least of the following factors:
- The
manufacturer's gross vehicle mass rating of the vehicle,
denoted GVM. This can only be determined by the manufacturer
- not the dealer, not the operator - only the manufacturer;
- The
carrying capacity of the tyres as determined in the load
and inflation tables published and gazetted by the South
African Bureau of Standards - SABS 1550;
- The
maximum carrying capacity of roads as prescribed in Road
Traffic Regulation 240.
While
the least of these factors determines the "V", a
further consideration is the distribution of the load to ensure
that the permissible maximum individual axle massloads are
not exceeded.
Now, let
the capacity of a vehicle be determined according to the mass
of the payload which can legally be carried on the vehicle.
In this case, the determination of the maximum legal payload
is obtained as follows:
- Determine
the "V" of the vehicle in the manner described
in 1(a), (b) and (c).
- Determine
the unladen mass of the vehicle. This is not the tare (which
does not include fuel and the on-vehicle-personnel). It
is the vehicle complete and ready to operate. Also, the
unladen mass must include the body.
- To
establish the payload mass, the unladen mass is subtracted
from the "V" and the load distribution checked
to prevent exceeding any individual permissible axle massload.
Using
the information provided to FleetWatch for the 2001 edition
of TruckWatch, the appended two tables contain an analysis
of available 4 tonners based on approximately 4 tons gross
mass and 4 tons payload mass.
An
analysis of these two tables reveals several important things
which potential buyers of vehicles must take into consideration
when referring to the capacity of a particular make or model.
- Is
it the maximum gross mass of the vehicle or the maximum
achievable payload mass to which we are referring?
- When
we refer to gross mass, we should be referring to the permissible
maximum vehicle mass ("V"), and not the manufacturers'
gross vehicle mass ("GVM").
- When
we refer to the unladen mass of a vehicle, we must not be
confused between tare mass and unladen mass.
The
"tare" does not include fuel, driver and anything
not a part of the vehicle but unladen mass includes everything
except payload.
Finally,
analysing Table 1, it will be seen that of the vehicles available
in South Africa with a permissible gross mass (V) of just
over 4 tons, the maximum achievable payload is just over 2
tons, and Table 2 reveals that to achieve a payload of 4 tons,
the "V" must be between ± 8 000 and 9 000
kg permissible maximum vehicle mass ("V").
In
reality, if true comparisons are to be made between makes
and models of goods vehicles, surely the maximum achievable
payload should be the basis of comparison since it is the
payload which generates the revenue which a vehicle is capable
of earning.
TABLE 1
4
TON GROSS MASS VEHICLES
| MAKE
AND MODEL OF VEHICLE |
DYNA
S-103
|
FAWS
Cab 2T
|
ISUZU
|
IVECO
|
M
BENZ
413 FC
|
NISSAN
|
| Permissible
Maximum Vehicle Mass "V" |
4
500
|
4
500
|
No
Model
|
No
Model
|
4
600
|
No
Model
|
| Unladen
Mass Chassis Cab |
1
700
|
1
640
|
1
760
|
| Estimated
Body Mass |
800
|
800
|
800
|
| Max
Achievable Payload |
2
000
|
2
060
|
2
040
|
TABLE
2
4
TON PAYLOAD VEHICLES
|
MAKE
AND MODEL OF VEHICLE
|
DYNA
7-145
|
FAWCA
9.140
|
ISUZU
NOR500T
|
IVECO
|
M.BENZ
800
|
NISSAN
|
|
Permissible
Maximum Vehicle Mass
|
7
000
|
9
600
|
8
500
|
No
Model
|
7
900
|
No
Model
|
|
Unladen
Mass Chassis Cab
|
2
280
|
3
800
|
2
550
|
2
340
|
|
Estimated
Body Mass
|
1
000
|
1
000
|
1
000
|
1
000
|
|
Max
Achievable Payload
|
3
720
|
4
800
|
4
950
|
4
560
|
Additional
article
|