IRTE involvement in training:
|
|
|
Above:
Veteran IRTE member, Jack Webster, Ruth and Keith Pilling,
Barney and Patsy Curtis
|
At a recent
joint IRTE Centre meeting held in Cape Town at which representatives
from the Cape Town, Johannesburg and Durban Centres were present,
the subject of training in the transport industry was discussed
and concern was expressed that the IRTE has no representation
on the Standards Generating Body (SGB).
The IRTE
UK, to which South African members are affiliated, is the
nationally recognised body responsible for the setting of
standards of acceptable qualification in the road transport
industry.
At the
joint meeting, concern was expressed that there is no representation
by IRTE members on the proposed SGB as noted in Government
Gazette Vol 409. No 20311 dated 30th July 1999. The IRTE,
through the Cape Town Centre which holds the portfolio for
training on behalf of the institute, is to make representation
to the SGB for recognition and representation to this body
|
|
|
Funny
man, Phil Wolfaardt, MC for the
evening . . . seen with his wife
|
The IRTE
is represented at all levels of legislation policy formulation
including the Road Traffic Act and Regulations, the SABS technical
committees, and has a positive working relationship with all
these bodies
The Skills
Development Act No 97 of 1998 is intended: "To provide
an institutional framework to devise and implement national,
sector and workplace strategies to develop and improve the
skills of the South African workforce; to integrate those
strategies within the National Qualifications Framework contemplated
in the South African Qualifications Authority Act, 1995, to
provide for learnerships that lead to recognised occupational
qualifications, to provide for the financing of skills development
by means of a levy-financing scheme and a National Skills
Fund, to provide for and regulate employment services; and
to provide for matters connected therewith,"
|
|
|
Above:
Paul Kable of Cummins and his
wife, Maureen
|
The
rationale of this Act is:
(a) To develop the skills of the South African workforce
(i) To improve the quality of life of workers, their prospects
of work and labour mobility.
(ii) To improve productivity in the workplace and the competitiveness
of employers.
(iii) To promote self-employment.
(iv) To improve the delivery of social services.
(b) To increase the levels of investment in education
and training in the labour market and to improve the return
on that investment.
(c) To encourage employers to use the workplace as
an active learning environment:
(ii) To provide employees with the opportunities to acquire
new skills.
(iii) To provide opportunities for new entrants to the labour
market to gain work experience
(iv) To employ persons who find it difficult to be employed.
(d) To encourage workers to participate in leadership
and other training programs.
(e) To improve the employment prospects of persons
previously disadvantaged by unfair discrimination and to redress
those disadvantages through training and education.
(f) To ensure the quality of education and training
in and for the workplace.
(g) To assist work-seekers to find work
(i) Retrenched workers to re-enter the labour market.
(ii) Employers to find qualified employees.
(h) To provide and regulate employment services.
|
|
|
Vic
Oliver of
Nissan with his wife Mary
|
Those
purposes are to be achieved by:
(a) Establishing an institutional and financial framework
comprising
(i) The National Skills Authority.
(ii) The National Skills Fund.
(iii) A skills development levy-financing scheme as contemplated
in the Skills
Development
Levies Act.
(iv) SEATAs
(v) Labour centres
(vi) The Skills Development Planning Unit
(b) Encouraging partnerships between the public and
private sectors of the economy to provide education and training
in and for the workplace.
(c) Co-operating with the South African Qualifications
Authority.
|
|
|
Joe
Mokwala, Regional Office Manager,
Cummins Corporation, Southern Africa
|
Currently
SGB 11, which is responsible for standards within the transport
industry, complies with the requirements of the Act but it
has missed the spirit of consultation by not ensuring that
all stakeholders were approached. This inclusion does not
only affect professional bodies like the IRTE but also the
transporters of hazardous products and other specialised categories.
The IRTE
is concerned that the current composition of the proposed
SGB consists of too many academics without the necessary industry
experience in formulating workable relevant training courses.
The Government
Gazette Vol. 416, No 20919, dated 22nd February 2000, lays
out the training outcomes for a National Certificate in Professional
Driving. Once the candidate has reached the NQF level 3, they
will qualify for a managerial position, which the industry
may or may not absorb.
The IRTE
is concerned that with inappropriate representation, the proposed
skills development modules will not meet the practical requirements
of the industry
The IRTE
questions the viability of the professional driver ultimately
meeting the proposed standards and is concerned that many
drivers who would otherwise qualify as excellent would not
aspire to meet the ultimate prescribed qualification.
It is
hoped that the representation by the IRTE Cape Centre will
result in the Institute being accepted and recognised on the
Standards Generating Bodies for all transport related matters.
|